Etika Publikasi dan Pernyataan Malpraktik

This journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and taking all necessary action against unethical publication practices. All parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and publishers, are expected to adhere to these standards.

This statement is based on the best practice guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

1. Duties and Responsibilities of Authors
Authors are required to present original research results and accurate data objectively.
Authors ensure that the manuscript has not been previously published and is not under consideration by another journal.
Any citations and use of the work of others must be properly attributed.
All authors listed must have made significant contributions to the research.
Fraudulent statements or data manipulation are unethical and unacceptable.
Authors are required to disclose any conflicts of interest that might influence the results of the research.

2. Plagiarism Policy

Plagiarism in any form constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. All submitted manuscripts will be checked using plagiarism detection software.

The degree of similarity in manuscripts must be within the limits determined by the editorial board.
Manuscripts found to contain plagiarism will be immediately rejected.


3. Duties and Responsibilities of Editors
The editor is responsible for determining which manuscripts are suitable for publication.
Editors evaluate manuscripts based on their academic merit without discrimination.
Editors are required to maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts.
Editors must avoid conflicts of interest.
Editors may request revisions, accept, or reject manuscripts based on the results of the review.


4. Duties and Responsibilities of Reviewers
Reviewers assist editors in the editorial decision-making process.
Reviewers are required to provide objective, constructive, and timely assessments.
Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts they review.
Reviewers are expected to identify relevant references not cited by the authors.
Reviewers are required to decline review if they have a conflict of interest.